Judge Duxtover Rules of the US Institute of Peace. UU. It was illegal and “power usurpation”

Judge Duxtover Rules of the US Institute of Peace. UU. It was illegal and "power usurpation"

A federal judge ruled on Monday that the acquisition of the Trump Administration of the United States Institute of the United States was illegal, and the efforts of the Government’s efficiency department to dismantle the agency are “null and null”, according to judicial presentations.

The ruling of the federal judge of DC Beryl Howell says that the unilateral effort of President Donald Trump to dissolve the agency, which works mainly as a group of experts that supports the executive and legislative branches, exceeded its constitutional authorities and violated the statute established by the USIP.

“The president’s efforts here to take care of an organization outside those limits, contrary to the statute established by Congress and by acts of strength and threat using local and federal law officers, represented a gross usurpation of power and a way of carrying out government matters that unnecessarily traumatized the committed leadership and the employees of USIP, which deserved better.” government.

At an audience in March, the officials who were expelled from USIP described in dramatic detail what was essentially a forced acquisition of the agency for officials with Dux, assisted by agents armed with the FBI, members of the DC Police Department and officials of the DCUS law office.

“This realization of the use of the application of the law, threatening criminal investigation, the use of the application of the armed law of three different agencies … to carry out the executive order … with all that approach probably terrifying employees and personnel in the institute when there are many other legal ways of achieving the objectives … why?” Howell asked. “Just because Doge is in a hurry?”

See also  Cancer diagnosis of former President Joe Biden: What does a 9 -Gleason score mean?

But at that time, Judge Howell rejected an emergency request for the plaintiffs in the lawsuit to restore the Board of USIP, saying that they did not comply with the high legal burden that would guarantee a temporary restriction order.

“I am very offended by how Dege has operated at the Institute and treated US citizens who were trying to do a job that had the legal task at the institute,” Howell wrote in March. “But that concern … is not one that I have to influence my consideration of the factors for a tro.”

A view of the headquarters of the United States Institute of Peace Institute (USIP), March 18, 2025, in Washington, DC

Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

In his ruling on Monday, Howell said that USIP is unique in his state, since apparently a mixture between an executive agency and a private non -profit corporation, and that Trump’s aggressive approach to expel the members of his board and replace them with Doge officials seemed to violate a statute that required the approval of the congress.

“The actions that have occurred … to the president’s direction to reduce Usip to his ‘legal minimums’, including the elimination of the president of USIP, his replacement by the officials affiliated with Dux, the termination of almost all USIP personnel and the transfer of properties of USIP to the General Administration of Services (‘GSA’), therefore, the leaders of the Nausos, therefore, the legal leaders who lack the legal leaders who lack the legal leaders who lack the legal leaders. Legal authority to the lack of authority to the lack of authority to the lack of authority in the absence of authority in the absence of authority to the lack of authority to the lack of authority to the lack of authority to the lack of authority to the lack of authority to the lack of authority to the lack of authority to the lack of authority to the lack of authority to the lack of authority to the lack of the lack of authority to the lack of authority Lack of authority to the lack of authority in the absence of the authority of actions.

See also  The New Jersey Traffic Strike underway; Some 350,000 travelers fight for transportation

It is likely that the administration appeals the ruling, which makes it one of a series of legal fights on an appeal with respect to President Trump’s removal authorities.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

3 × 2 =